Hot Rod Secrets of Dodge's New Mini-Muscle Turbo Car

Inside the SRT-4 2.4L

September 2003
Engines
If Plymouth's Road Runner had survived the Volare years, it might look like an '03 Dodge SRT-4. The formula is just like the '68 bird, but minus the cubes, plus the turbo, and with the drive wheels on the wrong end. Mopar's PVO factory power tweakers took the base Neon four-door sedan, added the critical speed goodies to the suspension and interior, tossed in a Viper Jr. nose and a new-millennium- Super-Bird wing, and hit the little 2.4L four-cylinder with an intercooled turbo for 215 hp and 245 lb-ft. With weight in the zip code of 2,870, the SRT-4 packs 13.35 ponies per pound--smokin' the '68 Road Runner 383's 10:1, and running right alongside it with bone-stock 14.20s at the dragstrip.
 The specific engine we tore apart for this story is from a PT Turbo, but the guts are the same as the SRT-4's engine; only the intake manifold and turbo plumbing is different
Enough with the sales pitch. It's clear that the SRT-4 will be the Omni GLH of the 2000s, and plenty of guys hungry to flip the bird to the import compacts will happily pay the sub-20-Gs sticker price, then hose the car down with speed goodies. This story may also be of interest to those without an SRT-4, as the 2.4L was introduced in '94 in the Stratus, Cirrus, and the minivans, and it still appears in those applications. The base 2.4L is also current in the PT Cruiser, and it's called Power Tech in the new Jeep Wrangler SE and Liberty. The Jeep applications mean that rear-drive bellhousings are available for the 2.4, and it's rumored that the Dodge Razor concept car may see production as a turbo-2.4L-powered, rear-drive two-seater. The 2.4 is also similar to the SOHC and DOHC 2.0L engines used in various Neons, Breezes, Stratuses, Avengers, and Sebrings since '93, but the 2.0L block has a lower deck height (8.35 versus 9.38 inches), does not have balance shafts, and may have other interchangeability issues we can't vouch for (though the 2.0L DOHC does use the same cylinder head as the 2.4L).

To get a leg up on the workings of the boosted 2.4L powerplant and its performance potential, we had the rare treat of spending a day at DaimlerChrysler's Tech Center in Auburn Hills, Michigan, with the guys who designed the turbo version of the 2.4L engine--and there's a lot more to it than just the hairdryer.

 

While the turbo 2.4 is the same basic configuration as the NA version, the casting has some slight revisions that we will outline, and it can be identified by the T cast into the front (intake) side, of the block. These are currently in '03 PT Turbos and SRT-4s, but will also be used in '04 naturally aspirated applications
A significant addition to the turbo block is the inclusion of an extra oil gallery that is tapped for piston squirters in four positions. These spray oil on the underside of the pistons to cool the domes for durability and to prevent preignition due to elevated combustion-chamber temps. All '04 blocks will have this provision, but squirters will not be used on NA applications
Another upgrade for the turbo that will find its way to all '04 versions is a water-jacket upgrade that's barely visible as a slight bump in the triangular openings on the deck surface (arrow). Using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) analysis, DaimlerChrysler engineers were able to model the fluid flow through the block and create ramps in the water passages that direct as much as six times the mass of coolant between the cylinders.
The turbo block also needed a few extra passages to accommodate oil to the turbo and a remote oil cooler. This is all on the backside of the block, or the exhaust side, for a front-drive application. On a rear-drive Jeep or the funky hot rod of your choice, it'd be the passenger side. In a front-drive, the cylinders are numbered 4-3-2-1 from driver to passenger side
The 3.98-inch-stroke crank is a nodular iron casting, but with increased surface hardness as compared to NA engines. It's retained by an iron bed plate that incorporates all the lower halves of the main-bearing journals. The plate is located on dowels and must be tapped into place with a rubber mallet, then torqued to 30 lb-ft plus 90 degrees on the mains and 21 lb-ft on the outer perimeter bolts. Mopar nonaerobic sealer PN 4773257 must be used between the block and the bed plate. The bearing material is aluminum-tin alloy on a steel backing, and a contoured thrust surface was added to the thrust bearing.
Earlier 2.4L engines use a crank counterweight cast with eight integral reluctor windows for the computer's fuel and spark timing. The new 2.4 uses a separate machined wheel with 32 windows fastened to the rearmost counterweight and is used with a more advanced computer. The new cranks have a machined pad for the reluctor and do not have drilled rod pins. The old block can be identified with a pickup midway down the rear of the block, while the new one is nearer the flywheel. Also note the one-piece rear main seal; Miller makes an installer tool.
The turbo connecting rods (bottom) have balance pads whereas the NA rods (top) do not. Also, the turbo rods are of C-70 forged steel rather than the powdered-metal construction of the NA rods, though both versions used cracked caps. Both rods weigh the same at the big end, aiding in production-line assembly of these internally balanced engines. The turbo rods are drilled with squirt holes to oil the cylinder walls and require unique bearings with feedholes. Turbo rods use floating piston pins while NA versions are pressed. The M9 bolts get 20 lb-ft plus 90 degrees.
The NA piston is on the left, the new turbo version on the right. CFD analysis and dyno testing showed that the ski-jump-shaped dome on the piston was desirable for performance, so compression ratio was reduced to 8.1:1 by decreasing the piston compression height to lower piston position in the cylinder. Both versions are Mahle eutectic castings with Mahle Grafal skirt coating, but the turbo version also has a hard-anodized top ringland, a moly-coated 1.2mm top ring and has a shorter skirt, contributing to the 335-gram weight
The oil pump is driven from the snout of the crank, and its housing completes the oil-pan seal. The gerotor-type pump was redesigned to increase output to feed both the turbo and the piston squirters, and it moves 15 cc's of oil per revolution compared to 12 cc's with the previous version. This pump is now used on both turbo and NA 2.4 engines, and is identified by a T on the housing casting.
The balance-shaft assembly includes a housing, two shafts, and a chaindrive with tensioner driven from the crank snout. The parts are labeled clearly to avoid mistiming them, though in full-race applications where vibration is not an issue it would be OK to leave them out entirely. There's an oil-feed hole that must be plugged to omit the balance assembly.
Here's a neat tip that we'd like to see available for our musclecar V-8s: The oil-pan gasket has tabs that act as an integral crank-scraper for oil control. The oil pan is a cast-aluminum unit designed mostly for noise, vibration, and harshness suppression; we suspect Moroso will offer performance versions.
Oil routing and filter-pad location vary with the vehicle application. The PT Turbo and SRT-4 uses this oil cooler with integral filter boss.
The cylinder head is the same for turbo and NA engines, though the boosted application uses Silchrome-1 intake valves and Inconel exhaust valves. The head uses a four-valve, dual-overhead-cam design, with a pent-roof chamber, centrally located spark plug, and quench areas on both sides of the chamber. The turbo head gasket is an upgraded three-layer design.
Hydraulic cam followers are used in the 2.4L along with roller followers with a ratio of 1.78:1 on the base circle and 1.71:1 on the nose of the lobe. For degreeing the camshafts, Mopar Performance offers solid lifter PN P4452014.
The cam retainers are numbered front-to-back and left or right, and there are caps front and rear that require Loctite 518 anaerobic sealer. The cam-seal press tool is Miller C4680-1. Note the cam-sync pickup at the end of the intake cam.
Another special tool, Miller 6792-1, is needed to press the drive for the cam timing belt. This pulley is a cool powdered-metal design, and it rides behind the damper.
Here's the completed cam-drive setup minus the stock damper and plastic timing cover. The cams are the same as the NA application, and aftermarket grinds as well as adjustable timing gears should be available soon.
The turbo versions of the 2.4L use a cast-aluminum cover as opposed to composite, and they have a trick internal baffle system to cope with turbo pressures. It's also isolated on rubber for noise suppression. Check the neat coil and wire setup.
The meat of it comes with the all-new exhaust manifold, a casting that's integral with the turbine housing for the turbocharger. The turbo assembly can be split in two between the compressor and the turbine, but it is not recommended. The turbo itself is a Mitsubishi reverse-rotation model with a 6-square-centimeter inlet and an integral surge-valve/wastegate and both oil and water cooling; it peaks at 14 psi through the intercooler.
There are two intake manifolds and intercooler designs for the 2.4, one for PTs and another for SRT-4s. The engineers tell us the designs are similar in power production, and modeled mostly for packaging under the hoods. This is the long-runner PT Turbo intake; the SRT-4 version is much lower and smaller, with shorter runners. Both use the same throttle-body, which is common to the NA engines as well.
 

The ECU End of It

The turbo 2.4L is the first boosted engine to use DaimlerChrysler's Next Generation Controller. As the SAE paper describes, "The NGC algorithms are 'model-based,' continuously calculating the appropriate control parameters to keep the engine at its desired performance. This is a departure from past control strategies that relied on pre-programmed tables of operating conditions." The system is speed density rather than mass air.

Interestingly, the wastegate control is dictated by throttle demand rather than a simple blowoff at a set boost pressure. This way, the computer can estimate the power needs of the driver and either provide boost pressure or not. The good news is that you may get more boost in some conditions than a basic mechanical blowoff might provide; the bad news is that the computer "can also reduce the torque as required to ensure powertrain durability," per the SAE paper. The system uses an air charge temp (ACT) sensor after the intercooler as well as a throttle inlet pressure (TIP) sensor. The combined information can predict turbo compressor speed and pressure drop across the throttle blades and the IAC. It's this combination of information that has been giving fits to aftermarket companies trying to modify the Mopars with electronic throttle control (ETC). With the 2.25-bar (33-psi) sensors on the turbo 2.4, hopefully there will be more room for increased airflow and performance. Mopar Performance is already working on Stage I, II, and III power packages for, we hear, up to 300 hp.